1 1 2 3 4 KERRVILLE-KERR COUNTY JOINT AIRPORT BOARD 5 Regular Meeting 6 Monday, April 18, 2011 7 8:30 a.m. 8 Airport Terminal Conference Room 9 1877 Airport Loop Road 10 Kerrville, Texas 11 12 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Fred Vogt, Vice-President Stephen King, President 13 Tom Moser Mark Cowden 14 Corey Walters 15 16 AIRPORT BOARD STAFF PRESENT: Bruce McKenzie, Airport Manager 17 Laurie DeJohn-Ermey, Executive Assistant 18 COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: 19 Jeannie Hargis, Auditor Robert Henneke, Attorney 20 Keith Coleman, Development Services Director 21 CITY STAFF PRESENT: Mike Erwin, Finance Director 22 23 VISITORS: Else Bailey, Airport Attorney 24 Keith Neffendorf, Independent Auditor 25 2 1 I N D E X 2 1. VISITORS FORUM 3 3 2. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: 4 2A Monthly Financials 7 5 2B Financial Statement and Independent 13 Auditor's Report FY 2010 6 2C Possible Annexation of Property Adjacent 39 7 Al Mooney Road 8 3. INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION: 9 3A Phase II Construction Update 49 10 3B Update on New Directional Sign 52 11 3C Master Plan Update 58 12 4. EXECUTIVE SESSION 64 13 5. ADJOURNMENT 74 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 1 On Monday, April 18, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., a 2 regular meeting of the Kerrville-Kerr County Joint 3 Airport Board was held in the Airport Terminal 4 Conference Room, Louis Schreiner Field, Kerrville, 5 Texas, and the following proceedings were held in open 6 session: 7 P R O C E E D I N G S 8 MR. VOGT: Good morning. We're going 9 to call it at 8:30 and start the Kerrville-Kerr 10 County Joint Airport Board meeting at 8:30, 18 11 April. We have a new court reporter. Her name is 12 Robin Brame, and so the rules are the same as it is 13 when Kathy is here. We need to try to talk just one 14 person at a time. We don't want to scare her away, 15 otherwise she'll never come back. 16 I look at the audience. I know 17 Mr. Neffendorf. Yeah. 18 MR. ERWIN: Is this the visitor's 19 forum? 20 MR. VOGT: Well, you're not a visitor. 21 MR. ERWIN: No, sir, but I have a 22 couple of questions that aren't on the agenda. 23 MR. VOGT: All right. Mike, go ahead, 24 and -- 25 MR. ERWIN: No. Go ahead. I'll let 4 1 you finish but -- 2 MR. VOGT: Well, our next thing would 3 be if there is any visitors here or if there is 4 anything on the agenda that's not being brought up 5 in our -- outside the agenda. It's time to speak. 6 You have two minutes. 7 MR. ERWIN: Back at City Hall they had 8 asked me, we did notice that the Mooney T.C.E.Q. 9 issue was on the agenda and we were just -- we have 10 contacted T.C.E.Q., the City has, and gotten the 11 most up-to-date report, but we were wondering if 12 there were any actions that the Board was 13 considering, any steps that y'all were looking at 14 taking that we needed to be aware of. 15 MR. VOGT: Do we have the same 16 information that they have? 17 MR. MOSER: We should have everything 18 up to date what they have. Else and I met with 19 Barry last week and had a visit with them. We're 20 going to talk about that as well in executive 21 session, but there is nothing -- there is no 22 updates. What I'm trying to do now is see if we can 23 get a RAMP grant funding, if we need to do any 24 environmental studies over there to see if we can 25 get the grant to pay for some of that. That's where 5 1 we are at now with the paint shop. 2 MS. BAILEY: I'll talk to you about 3 that after the meeting so we can find out if you 4 have any updates because I haven't talked to 5 T.C.E.Q. in a while. 6 MR. ERWIN: Okay. All right. 7 MR. VOGT: All right. So, during 8 executive session you're going to -- we're going to 9 discuss this Mooney lease, but what you brought up 10 is not executive session. There must be 11 something -- just answer Mike's question. 12 MR. MOSER: So, bottom line as far as 13 we're concerned, that's all Mooney's responsibility. 14 MR. VOGT: Yeah. 15 MR. MOSER: Bottom, I mean, simple. 16 Simplistically. 17 MR. VOGT: It is. The problem is he 18 just mentioned something that's going to cost us 19 money. RAMP grant money is money that's obligated 20 or that's money that comes to us that we're now 21 going to divert to some other project. 22 MS. BAILEY: It's really two separate 23 issues, but we'll clarify that in executive session. 24 MR. VOGT: All right. We'll go -- 25 MR. MOSER: Am I not correct? Bottom 6 1 line is that's their -- 2 MS. BAILEY: Yes. 3 MR. MOSER: -- that's their 4 responsibility. 5 MR. WALTERS: For the lease. 6 MR. VOGT: Well, that's all we have. 7 MR. MOSER: For the lease that we 8 don't have. 9 MS. BAILEY: Yeah. 10 MR. VOGT: All right. We will 11 defer -- 12 MR. MOSER: For the old lease. 13 MR. WALTERS: For the old lease. 14 MR. VOGT: And we'll defer that to the 15 executive session. 16 MR. MOSER: Yeah. All right. Got it. 17 MR. VOGT: Was there anything else, 18 Mike, that -- 19 MR. ERWIN: No. 20 MR. VOGT: -- as you walk out the door 21 that Mr. Parton had for you? 22 MR. ERWIN: No, sir. 23 MR. VOGT: Okay. Thank you. We're 24 at -- all right then. I'm going to move to 25 discussion of possible action, monthly financials. 7 1 Jeannie? 2 MS. HARGIS: I think you all have a 3 copy of them. You got them in advance. Total 4 amount of cash in the general fund is 335,687.10. 5 If you go to Page 3, the total amount 6 spent in the first page was for revenue is 7 22,425.15, a total year to date of 232,484.33. We 8 still have 56.35 to collect. I've asked our 9 treasurer to transfer money, more money over there 10 as well. And Page 4 begins the expenses. The 11 salaries for the month 18,447.48, year to date 12 107,494.52. And then if you'll go to Page 6, the 13 total of the other expenses 11,928.42. For the 14 airport there our total year to date, 48,427.76. 15 Page 7 includes the utilities for here. It shows 16 32,261.09 total for a total of 163,636.39 year to 17 date. We are showing a definite balance of 9,835.94 18 for the month. I think it's mainly because remember 19 last month we transferred those two contingency 20 items which totaled about $6,100 so that we could 21 clear up the shortfall in the master plan which was 22 $2,400, then other 2,000 for the RAMP grant that we 23 were short from the prior year. So, those funds 24 have been transferred and that's why it's a little 25 bit higher than normal. 8 1 On Page 8 the capital money we have 2 226,708.53 cash. Turn to Page 9. Again, this is 3 where we brought this money transfer in, 6,072.30. 4 And then Page 10, 46,516.75 year to date. That's 5 the water system improvements and the RAMP grant 6 funds. Total spent 275,684.71. That's mostly the 7 water except for that transfer, and that gives us a 8 total year to date of 46,565.75 and year to date 9 encumbrance of 275,684.71. 10 It is showing that we're negative and 11 the reason for that is all that income went in the 12 prior year and our expenses are in the current year, 13 so that's the reason. You still have it in your 14 fund but in cash in the bank, but it's not -- the 15 revenue was shown in the prior year. 16 The capital improvement projects, we 17 worked on this a little bit to try to improve this. 18 The first one is that year relocation of the 19 taxiway. You see there that there is 132,852.29 20 remaining there that would be coming from TxDOT 21 because they have those funds. The airport water 22 line, we still have 26,688.41. We have a note there 23 that says if there is no other bills there that can 24 be split between the City and the County. The RAMP 25 grant, the City's portion is there. The County's 9 1 portion will be there next month. You have 7,892.70 2 so far that you spent and 17,107.30 left out of that 3 25,000. 4 The master plan is now at zero before 5 we show the negative and that's been corrected, so 6 the total there of all the cash remaining is 7 226,708.53. 8 MR. VOGT: Jeannie? 9 MS. HARGIS: Yes. 10 MR. VOGT: Before you go on, the 11 remaining money for the water line? 12 MS. HARGIS: Yes, the 26,000. 13 MR. VOGT: Is there a holdback on that 14 for, I don't know, performance or testing or -- 15 MR. McKENZIE: We have passed the 16 final punch list and I've signed off on the 17 retainage. 18 MR. VOGT: Okay. 19 MR. McKENZIE: So, that should be what 20 is actually left over. 21 MR. MOSER: So, that's what's left 22 over? 23 MR. VOGT: Thank you. 24 MS. HARGIS: And that's yours to 25 allocate however you want to do that. I did make a 10 1 mistake. That 132,852.29 is in our checking 2 account. That's the funds that we had left that we 3 didn't send to TxDOT, but we can't spend any of that 4 until we finish that project. 5 On the second page is the TxDOT 6 projects and we received this information directly 7 in TxDOT. And if you match back, you can see the 8 taxiway relocation. TxDOT says that they still have 9 169,399 to spend out of a $6 million project, of 10 that 18,821.94 is our portion. The relocate -- the 11 second relocate, because these are two different 12 numbers that you can see, they still have 13 225,080.75. And then relocate west entrance road, 14 that's a $2 million project. They still have 15 831,115.38. Now, these balances are as of 3/31. 16 The update of the master plan, they still show that 17 they have 74,390.86 that they haven't spend, but 18 these are all the current projects that are 19 outstanding. 20 MR. VOGT: Right. 21 MS. HARGIS: These are the balances. 22 MR. McKENZIE: That's good. 23 MS. HARGIS: So, I hope this is the 24 information. And if you take the local and go back 25 to this sheet, you should pretty much match. 11 1 MR. MOSER: That's good. Thanks, 2 Jeannie, for doing that. 3 MR. COWDEN: Jeannie, can I ask you a 4 question? 5 MS. HARGIS: Yes. 6 MR. COWDEN: In last month's package, 7 we're talking about accurate number on all that 8 equipment for the balance sheet? 9 MS. HARGIS: I haven't -- it will 10 be -- 11 MR. COWDEN: Is that this? 12 MS. HARGIS: I don't know. I have not 13 seen it. 14 MR. COWDEN: I didn't see it until 15 after the fact. 16 MS. HARGIS: This is part of the 17 purchase list. No, this wouldn't be all of our 18 assets because I wanted to wait until Keith 19 presented the audit. 20 MR. COWDEN: All right. 21 MS. HARGIS: Once you approved the 22 audit, then he's going to give me his, all of his 23 numbers. 24 MR. COWDEN: Okay. 25 MS. HARGIS: And then I'll fill them 12 1 in. 2 MR. COWDEN: Okay. 3 MS. HARGIS: Then I'll give you a 4 total list of everything. 5 MR. COWDEN: Okay. 6 MS. HARGIS: But I have asked for 7 that, but I haven't gotten it from him yet. 8 MR. COWDEN: Okay. 9 MS. HARGIS: Because I didn't -- I 10 don't have that. That didn't come from the City and 11 I wanted them to be audited numbers. 12 MR. COWDEN: Okay. That makes sense. 13 MS. HARGIS: Because I need to get the 14 proper amount of appreciation schedules. 15 MR. COWDEN: Right. 16 MS. HARGIS: The whole bit on those, 17 so I want -- I mean, I have the current stuff we 18 bought in the last 18 months, but that's about it. 19 MR. COWDEN: Okay. 20 MR. VOGT: Do I hear a motion to 21 accept the financials? 22 MR. COWDEN: I move. 23 MR. VOGT: Mark. 24 MR. WALTERS: Second. 25 MR. VOGT: Cory, second. Anymore 13 1 discussion? All in favor say "Aye." 2 (The motion carried by unanimous vote, 3 4-0.) 4 MR. VOGT: All right. 4-0. 5 All right. Speaking of the 6 independent auditor's report, Mr. Neffendorf, Keith, 7 is here to present that. Keith? 8 MR. NEFFENDORF: Okay. Hi, I'm Keith 9 Neffendorf with Neffendorf, Knopp, Doss & Company 10 out of Fredericksburg. And as a brief overview, I 11 always like to go over a couple of items first 12 before we get started. I don't know if you want me 13 to stand up. Can you hear me? 14 MR. VOGT: We can hear you. 15 MR. MOSER: We can hear you, yeah. 16 MR. NEFFENDORF: Usually nobody has 17 any problem hearing me, but if you don't, just let 18 me know because I have been standing up or sitting 19 down or microphoned or whatever you want. But 20 anyway, for a brief overview this was the first 21 independent audit done of the Airport Board. Okay. 22 And as a joint venture between the City and the 23 County, y'all's operations are dependent really upon 24 basically how much they want to fund, so your 25 financial statements reflect that, that any numbers 14 1 that you have accrued basically are the ability of 2 the City and the County that have funded you in the 3 past and what level they funded you at is how much 4 you have been able to carry forward and fund balance 5 and retained earnings. And as a joint venture of 6 the two governments, the financial statements, of 7 course, are prepared on a governmental basis. 8 Back in 2004 GASB 34 had this 9 wonderful idea that we're going to prepare two sets 10 of financial statements. 11 MR. MOSER: What's GASB? 12 MR. NEFFENDORF: Governmental 13 Standards Board. 14 MR. MOSER: Okay. 15 MR. NEFFENDORF: You prepare two sets 16 of financial statements for a governmental entity. 17 The first set is what I call -- what we all have 18 seen in the past on the governmental basis. That's 19 basically what the records are kept on, that's what 20 you adopt the budget on and it's just records your 21 revenues and expenditures. The second set is the 22 business model where we actually convert to a 23 business-type financial statement where we book all 24 your assets, the related depreciation and we record 25 the depreciation expense. Of course, y'all don't 15 1 have any long-term debts, so we don't have to 2 recognize any liabilities. And you come up just 3 like a business would with a net income statement or 4 a net profit for that business. And then there is a 5 conversion and they're reflected in our report. 6 That's called the reconciliation of adjustments, how 7 we convert it from governmental to the GASB basis. 8 Okay? You got it? We'll go over that later. 9 MR. MOSER: Everybody summarize. 10 MR. NEFFENDORF: I'll go over it. 11 What I always do is I just go through and hit the 12 high points. 13 MR. VOGT: Okay. 14 MR. NEFFENDORF: If you have any 15 questions at any point, just stop and ask me or if 16 later you get some, you can give me a call. 17 After the index on Page 1, this is the 18 independent auditor's report and this is the whole 19 purpose of the audit. This is what the auditor's 20 job is is to issue an opinion on y'all's financial 21 statements. The first paragraph says we have made 22 an audit of the financial statements of the Airport 23 Board as of and for the year ending September 30th, 24 2010. And in the third paragraph there we state in 25 our opinion the financial statements referred to 16 1 above present fairly the financial position of the 2 Airport Board as of September 30th, 2010, and this 3 is the standard auditor's clean opinion letter, 4 unqualified opinion. 5 After that Pages 3 through 6 are 6 something -- there is a statement called management 7 discussion analysis. It's labeled unaudited. This 8 is a requirement of GASB 34 where the financial 9 statements are condensed and it gives a brief and 10 fair summary of your financial highlights. We're 11 not required to give an audit opinion on it, so I'm 12 not going to go over it. The leaders of financial 13 statements like this though because in three pages 14 they can read what they -- and get an overview of 15 your financial statement versus the 20 pages in the 16 back. 17 Page 6 is the first statement we give 18 an opinion on. That's called statement of net 19 assets. This would be the equivalent of a balance 20 sheet. And as I said before, this is done on the 21 GASB 34 model, so it includes all your fixed assets 22 and related depreciation. The assets, of course, 23 within the year, besides the cash and the other 24 major investment are your capital assets. You had 25 total assets of 14,653,000. Your liabilities, of 17 1 course, for your accounts payable and deferred 2 revenues 47,000. So, you had net assets or 3 equivalent of a retained earnings or stockholder 4 exempt would be 14,605,000. 5 MR. MOSER: On the land assets, what 6 is that just the appraisal amount or where did that 7 come from, the 2,800,000? 8 MR. NEFFENDORF: Well, it was booked 9 on the City's fixed asset listing. I'm assuming if 10 you probably went back to costs or estimated costs 11 at some point. 12 MR. MOSER: So, is that updated or -- 13 MR. ERWIN: I'll check and let you 14 know. 15 MR. MOSER: Yeah. It's just 16 curiosity. Just -- okay. 17 MR. NEFFENDORF: And like I said 18 before, you see the net asset. That's the 19 stockholder equity or retained earning equivalent of 20 14 million. Of course, a big chunk of that 21 $14.8 million is investment in the capital assets. 22 Pages 7 and 8 is the statement 23 activities. This would be the equivalent to an 24 income statement. It's a requirement -- it's 25 required by GASB 34. Start out, of course, the 18 1 expenses for the airport operations 594,348 and you 2 have your charges for services 200,000. So, without 3 any funding from anybody else you can see the 4 airport lost 394,000. You add back the capital 5 grants and contributions, the TxDOT money spent, 6 7,196,000 and at the bottom it shows your general 7 revenue as grants and contributions from the City 8 and County, investment earnings. So, for the year 9 you had a net change positive 7,628,000. It 10 increased your net assets to 14 million. 11 Page 9 is the balance sheet. This is 12 what I was talking about before, the governmental 13 basis. It shows the funds and then for the assets, 14 liabilities and fund balance you can see the general 15 operating fund at $270,000 in cash and roughly 16 262,000 fund balance. Capital projects at 496,000 17 in cash and a fund balance of 492,000. So, overall 18 the airport board had 801,000 in assets, only 47,000 19 in liabilities. So, a net fund balance is 754,000. 20 The next page, this is how we 21 reconcile for governmental GASB. We start out with 22 a fund balance of 754,000. We add back the capital 23 assets with net book value at the beginning of the 24 year. That's that 5,779,000. You add back to 25 current year capital outlays 7,657,000 and subtract 19 1 your depreciation expense from the 90,798 and add 2 back the prior period of adjustments that was for 3 the amount that were shown as prepaid expenses and 4 should have been in construction work in progress, 5 so you come up with the net assets under GASB 34 of 6 14,605,000. 7 MR. MOSER: The reason I asked what 8 the value of the land and the buildings and so forth 9 is if you look at this, more than half of our 10 capital assets are the improvements we just made, so 11 it doesn't account for all the -- I mean, it seemed 12 like there is -- the whole property is worth a whole 13 lot more than that, but I think for the auditing 14 purposes, you know -- 15 MS. HARGIS: Cost. 16 MR. NEFFENDORF: Right. Because it 17 goes back to original cost. 18 MR. MOSER: Yeah, right. 19 MR. NEFFENDORF: That's normal. 20 MR. COWDEN: There is not a market. 21 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 22 MR. NEFFENDORF: It's not based on a 23 fair market value. 24 MR. MOSER: Okay. 25 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yes. 20 1 MR. MOSER: Okay. 2 MR. WALTERS: In the capital assets, 3 the buildings you have got at 3.5 million. Is 4 there -- did you just take that off the historic or 5 what was already booked or is there any itemization 6 of that? 7 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yes. Uh-huh. 8 MR. WALTERS: There is an itemization? 9 MR. NEFFENDORF: Right. Uh-huh. 10 MR. WALTERS: And where is that? 11 MR. NEFFENDORF: Well, we got it 12 from -- the City had a detailed listing of it that 13 we got that from them and it shows the assets and 14 the depreciation life and schedule and then we made 15 the additions. 16 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 17 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. We have that 18 schedule of what we added to it, so we'd be glad to 19 provide that and y'all can go over that. 20 MS. HARGIS: That's what I said once 21 he gives it to me -- 22 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. 23 MS. HARGIS: -- I'll convert it and 24 bring it to ideal. 25 MR. WALTERS: Yeah. I would like to 21 1 get it attached to part of this. 2 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. You'll have to 3 get one updated and get it in a format. It's off 4 their system, off the encode system, it's a little 5 different format than you're used to seeing or like 6 I'm used to seeing. We like to see the asset, the 7 cost, the depreciation method period, accumulated 8 depreciation. That's what we converted it over to. 9 MR. COWDEN: We're just trying to 10 figure out which building. 11 MR. NEFFENDORF: Right. 12 MR. WALTERS: What the values of the 13 buildings are and what we're, you know, specifically 14 looking at is what value they have for the Mooney 15 facilities. 16 MR. NEFFENDORF: Okay. Yeah. They're 17 separate. I think they're separately listed on 18 that. I'm pretty sure they're separately listed on 19 that -- 20 MS. HARGIS: They should be. 21 MR. NEFFENDORF: -- that report you 22 gave me. 23 MS. HARGIS: They should be listed. 24 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. 25 MS. HARGIS: But they're going to go 22 1 back to original cost -- 2 MR. NEFFENDORF: Exactly. 3 MS. HARGIS: -- from whenever they 4 acquired them and so it's not going to be fair 5 market value. 6 MR. VOGT: And there is no -- there is 7 no factor in there -- except for depreciation there 8 is no factor in there in the general condition of 9 the buildings so -- 10 MS. HARGIS: No. No. 11 MR. VOGT: -- the number is almost 12 worthless. 13 MR. MOSER: That's what I said. This 14 is -- yeah. This is taken -- yeah. Got it. 15 MR. VOGT: I understand what you -- 16 MR. MOSER: It doesn't reflect the 17 real value. No. 18 MR. VOGT: All right. 19 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. 20 MR. WALTERS: The good news is 21 probably the land is certainly worth -- should be 22 worth a lot more than 2.8. 23 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 24 MR. WALTERS: But the bad news is 25 probably the value of some of these buildings is 23 1 what's reflected. 2 MR. VOGT: It's liabilities. It's 3 liabilities in some of those buildings. 4 MR. NEFFENDORF: And that's typical. 5 We found that that was the whole interesting point 6 about this GASB conversion stuff because if you look 7 at most cities, counties, school districts and any 8 other governmental, if they had the bulk of their 9 assets that were acquired years ago at a low cost 10 and now they're putting improvements in there, 11 shoot, 60, 75 percent of that audited number now is 12 all current stuff. 13 MR. COWDEN: Uh-huh. 14 MR. MOSER: Right. 15 MR. NEFFENDORF: You know from all 16 that stuff in the past that was bought and has been 17 depreciated and -- 18 MR. MOSER: Shows no value, correct. 19 MR. NEFFENDORF: And like he is 20 saying, the value of the land, you know, might be 20 21 times what they put on the books. 22 MR. MOSER: Sure. 23 MR. NEFFENDORF: But the other part is 24 the buildings, they're -- instead of an asset, 25 they're really a liability because they're -- it 24 1 depends on -- you know, I can't say that across the 2 board, but some entities have kept up with the 3 maintenance. 4 MR. VOGT: Uh-huh. 5 MR. NEFFENDORF: They have done a good 6 job of keeping improvements up, but that's -- 7 MR. VOGT: Uh-huh. 8 MR. NEFFENDORF: Okay. The next 9 statement is Page 11 was the statements of revenues 10 and expenditures on a governmental basis. That just 11 shows the revenues with the general operating fund 12 of 971,000 and expenditures of -- 13 MR. MOSER: What page are you on now? 14 MR. NEFFENDORF: Page 11. 15 MR. COWDEN: Page 11. 16 MR. MOSER: Page 11. Okay. Thank 17 you. 18 MR. NEFFENDORF: Expenditure 534, so 19 you had an excess of 436,000 for the transfer out to 20 the capital projects, so your net change was 21 positive in the general operating fund of 60,148. 22 The capital projects, of course, we 23 booked all the grant revenue received from the State 24 TxDOT on the improvement projects 7.2 million in 25 revenues, expenditures 7.6 million which included 25 1 the TxDOT expense. Under that grant plus what y'all 2 were would -- City and County were funding for the 3 other improvement like the water system to come up 4 with a deficit before transfers of 374,000, after 5 the transfers, the capital projects at $1,652 net 6 change. Positive overall between the two funds on a 7 governmental basis and net change positive 61,800. 8 You take that number at the top of the 9 next page, that's how we reconcile once again from 10 governmental GASB, you add back all the current year 11 capital outlay expenditures, 7.6 million, subtract 12 the depreciation expense of 90,000 to come up with 13 net change, 7,628,000. 14 The next section, Page 13, starts the 15 notes of the financial statements. These are 16 additional disclosures acquired by accounting -- 17 accepted accounting principles. The first part of 18 the notes just describe the use of the 19 government-wide GASB 34 and fund financial statement 20 used to fund accounting. So, those are pretty well 21 standardized. 22 Page 15, the second section of the 23 notes shows a reconciliation government-wide. 24 That's basically what I have gone over on those 25 reconciliation and recording of the capital assets 26 1 minus the depreciation. 2 The bottom of the page starts the 3 notes on deposits and investments. The deposits 4 were carried with the City and these authorized 5 pools who they are in accordance with the local 6 government. The public Funds Investment Act and 7 that's, what, Page 16. That just goes with the 8 investments were in accordance with the Public Funds 9 Investment Act. 10 Page 17, the top of that page shows 11 the capital assets activities and the changes for 12 the year. And then also the accumulated 13 depreciation beginning amounts, the amount 14 depreciated for the year ending balance. Note that 15 at the bottom of the page there is a disclosure for 16 the retirement plan that the employees or members of 17 the Texas county and district retirement system. 18 The same on Page 18, medical and life insurance for 19 Kerr County and Texas Association of Counties. 20 MR. WALTERS: Can I go back one more? 21 MR. NEFFENDORF: Sure. 22 MR. WALTERS: On buildings beginning 23 balance 3,057,00 and then an increase of 454, what 24 was that increase attributed to? 25 MR. MOSER: It must have been the 27 1 terminal? 2 MR. NEFFENDORF: The terminal 3 building. 4 MR. MOSER: The terminal, yeah. 5 MR. WALTERS: This building. 6 MR. COWDEN: That's the only 7 improvement I know of. 8 MR. VOGT: Depending how far back you 9 go this building has been around more than one year. 10 MR. WALTERS: That's why I was 11 curious. 12 MR. McKENZIE: Because this building 13 cost over a million dollars. 14 MR. MOSER: More than that. 15 MR. McKENZIE: I remember it costs a 16 million one something. 17 MR. NEFFENDORF: For the 18 adjustments -- 19 MS. HARGIS: Part of the adjustment 20 that got left off. 21 MR. NEFFENDORF: 454,968 came out of 22 work in progress. You look up at the top of that 23 page, look at the work in progress line, 454,968. 24 MR. MOSER: Sure. 25 MR. NEFFENDORF: Yeah. I think they 28 1 had booked that into work in progress and never 2 cleared that on this building. See, it was an 3 addition for that year. It was a movement from work 4 in progress through the buildings section. 5 MR. WALTERS: All right. 6 MR. NEFFENDORF: I think the building 7 was actually completed, but it should have just been 8 moved from -- 9 MR. McKENZIE: It just moved over. 10 MR. NEFFENDORF: Right. It just moved 11 from work in progress. 12 MR. WALTERS: And you did it, it never 13 was? 14 MR. NEFFENDORF: Right. 15 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 16 MR. NEFFENDORF: It was in work in 17 progress and we just moved it from work in progress 18 into building. And -- 19 MR. WALTERS: So, it wasn't 20 necessarily actual construction during that year. 21 MR. NEFFENDORF: No, it wasn't. It 22 wasn't an expenditure that year. 23 MR. WALTERS: Right. Okay. 24 MS. HARGIS: It's just prior to 25 adjustment. 29 1 MR. WALTERS: I understand. 2 MR. COWDEN: Picky, picky, picky. 3 MR. NEFFENDORF: Page 18. Let's see. 4 I was on the contracts and commitments. That just 5 discloses the contracts that were with the City for 6 interim management contract, the interlocal 7 agreement with the County for the employee benefits 8 and then through TxDOT and all that deal, projects 9 that's listed there. And showing the total project, 10 federal share and local share amounts. 11 On the last page, Page 19, reflects 12 the prior period adjustment from the recorded and 13 prepaid expenses and should have been a work in 14 progress. And finally, there were no subsequent 15 events that materially impact the financial 16 statements. 17 The required subsequent information on 18 Page 20 is the statement for revenue and 19 expenditures incurred for the budget for the general 20 operating fund. That just shows the original and 21 final budgeted amounts, revenues, budgeted amounts 22 1,367,000. You actually collected 971,000, so you 23 were short by 396,000. Expenditures, you budgeted 24 599,000, you actually spent 534, so you're under 25 budget by 64,000. And by the time it transfers out, 30 1 so the net change overall you had planned an 2 increase of $623 and it turned out to be 60,148. 3 So, a positive variance of 59,000 to the budget. 4 The next section is the supplemental 5 in your report is the federal awards section. 6 Because y'all received monies through the State 7 TxDOT, the federal grants require us to draft the 8 reports. The first part of it is the internal 9 control and compliance and other matters in 10 accordance with government auditing standards. That 11 says that in addition to our audit the financial 12 statement that attests for the internal control over 13 financial reporting and it says we found no material 14 or significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. 15 The second part of it is on compliance 16 and other matters. There was no -- we had to test 17 for compliance with lost contracts and grants. We 18 found no instances of noncompliance. Then the 19 filing the schedule of expenditures of federal 20 awards. A lot of the financial statements and as 21 part of that we had to prepare the schedule of 22 expenditures of federal awards and in our opinion it 23 is materially correct in relation to the financial 24 statements as a whole. 25 The next letter or report of 31 1 compliance with requirements each major program 2 under the Circular A-I33. This is a single audit. 3 Since y'all had over $500,000 in federal growth 4 dollars spent, you're required to have a single 5 audit. And in accordance with this circular, the 6 auditor is required to test for compliance with 7 laws, contracts, regulations and grants, and in our 8 opinion we found no material weaknesses or 9 noncompliance. The same way with the internal 10 control. We found no major weaknesses for internal 11 control. 12 And finally the schedule of findings 13 and questions costs, that just gives the summary of 14 the auditor's results. As I said before, there were 15 no significant deficiences or material weaknesses, 16 no material noncompliance, and those items as listed 17 there. 18 Then finally we got to the actual 19 schedule of expenditures and federal awards itself, 20 Exhibit K1. That just shows through the TxDOT those 21 four programs and, of course, the federal CFDA 22 number for almost all airport improvement projects 23 is that 20.106. Then you have your contract numbers 24 in the amount of federal expenditures under those 25 contracts, 7,196,490. 32 1 And then the last letter is a 2 requirement also that the auditor report to the 3 Board these items as listed in that letter and the 4 first part just says this goes with what our 5 responsibilities that are U.S. generally accepted 6 auditing standards. Significant audit findings, 7 there were none. There were no difficulties in 8 performing the audit. There were no correct or 9 uncorrected misstatements. Adjustments were made 10 and recorded. There were no disagreements with 11 management. And finally at the bottom we show our 12 recommendations for improvements, the recording of 13 the TxDOT grants and general ledger. We have the 14 grant revenues expenditures should be booked in the 15 general ledger of the airport to reflect those 16 assets and also the related revenues and 17 expenditures. 18 The fixed asset accounting, there was 19 a detailed listing made, kept and wherever we didn't 20 reconcile the general ledger, we worked to resolve 21 those differences, and now the detail listing should 22 be tied to the general ledger and be carried forward 23 and completed on a monthly basis. 24 Expenditure coding, there was a couple 25 of items that were shown as regular expenditures 33 1 that should have been coded in the capital outlay 2 for the new sign for 20,000 and there was a new 3 motor, 11,000. We made the appropriate 4 reconciliation. It's just being recommended that 5 the general ledger be reviewed. The proper 6 classification of expenditures. And that's it. 7 MR. MOSER: Are we required to do this 8 annually that the -- 9 MS. HARGIS: Yes. 10 MR. MOSER: Yes. Okay. 11 MR. WALTERS: And I don't know who I'm 12 asking this question to, but just what action are we 13 supposed to take with regards to this -- 14 MR. VOGT: Accept it. 15 MR. WALTERS: -- audit? Well, do we 16 accept it after you, the County and the City have 17 accepted it? 18 MS. HARGIS: No. 19 MR. WALTERS: Reviewed it and accepted 20 it? 21 MS. HARGIS: You accept it first, then 22 you -- it's your audit, so you need to accept it. 23 MR. WALTERS: And then give it to you 24 for your review and comments? 25 MS. HARGIS: Uh-huh. It's moved. So, 34 1 it's always been included as part of the City audit 2 so we just had to absorb it. 3 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 4 MS. HARGIS: Because we have to put 5 the -- because you're a component unit for both of 6 us, we have to put this information into our audit. 7 So, when Keith gets through with this and he turned 8 around and put it in the County audit and gives it 9 to the City and they put it in their audit. 10 MR. MOSER: So, previously it was part 11 of the City audit. That's -- 12 MS. HARGIS: It's never been pulled 13 out as a -- 14 MR. WALTERS: Right. Okay. 15 MS. HARGIS: -- separate audit. So, 16 it's good to have a document. That's the reason I 17 was pushing for this to get it. Number one, we both 18 need it as a component unit, so it needs to be done 19 early. 20 MR. MOSER: Right. 21 MS. HARGIS: It can be next year, but 22 it was a lot to do this year since it's never been 23 done. 24 MR. MOSER: Sure. 25 MS. HARGIS: Secondly, it provides a 35 1 separate document for all of us to keep up with the 2 assets -- 3 MR. MOSER: Right. 4 MS. HARGIS: -- properly and so forth. 5 MR. MOSER: Right. 6 MS. HARGIS: So, we can see where the 7 co-mingling brings out problems. 8 MR. MOSER: Right. That's true. 9 MS. HARGIS: So, I think this -- and 10 in the future when you're self-supporting and on 11 your own, you won't have to worry about creating 12 this. You'll already have it. 13 MR. MOSER: All right. Okay. 14 MS. HARGIS: And it's a good financing 15 document -- 16 MR. MOSER: Sure. 17 MS. HARGIS: -- if you ever wanted to 18 finance or go out for bonds, then you got this 19 document. 20 MR. MOSER: Right. 21 MR. VOGT: Can I ask Mike, do you have 22 any -- where is Mike? 23 MR. McKENZIE: He stepped out. 24 MR. VOGT: Oh, he stepped out for a 25 cigarette. Okay. Well, Jeannie, I mean, I would 36 1 have asked you the same question. Is there anything 2 in this audit that excites you or worries you or -- 3 MS. HARGIS: No. 4 MR. VOGT: -- otherwise? 5 MS. HARGIS: No. And I don't think 6 Mike has any problems either. I had him sign off on 7 it before I accepted it. So, I had he and Sandra 8 both sign off and send me a letter which I have in 9 the file. 10 MR. VOGT: Okay. I might ask him when 11 he comes back that same question. 12 MR. WALTERS: Before we actually take 13 action to accept it. 14 MR. VOGT: Yeah, I would like to 15 have -- 16 MR. WALTERS: I agree. 17 MR. VOGT: -- somebody in the City had 18 looked at it and they didn't throw up on it, I'm 19 okay. Maybe Keith can do it for the City. No, he 20 can't. I know. 21 MR. COLEMAN: I didn't throw up on it. 22 MR. VOGT: Is he on the phone? 23 MR. COLEMAN: He's on the phone. He 24 gave me a one so -- 25 MR. WALTERS: Here he comes. 37 1 MR. NEFFENDORF: As a joint venture in 2 the past, each entity of the City and County had to 3 pick up their part of the operations in their own 4 financial statements as a joint venture footnote 5 disclosure to the financial statements. Now, it's 6 the same thing only now they have -- 7 MR. VOGT: Mike? 8 MR. ERWIN: Yes, sir. 9 MR. VOGT: I asked Jeannie the same 10 question I'm asking you. I realize you get this. 11 We're going to -- we're going to make a motion on 12 this and pass it on and then you'll have -- you'll 13 have due diligence time to look at it. 14 MR. ERWIN: Right. 15 MR. VOGT: Having looked at it at 16 least preliminary, do you have any -- do you have 17 any grave issues or issues that you need to bring to 18 our attention at this time? 19 MR. ERWIN: No. We worked with 20 Mr. Neffendorf some on this and we enjoyed working 21 with him. We thought that he was thorough in the 22 work that he did. We had no issues. 23 MR. VOGT: Okay. 24 MR. NEFFENDORF: And I really 25 appreciate the cooperation you and Sandra gave me. 38 1 MR. VOGT: All right. 2 MR. ERWIN: And, in fact, we're about 3 to do our RFQs on audit services and we'll probably 4 be sending one to Mr. Neffendorf if that answers 5 your question. 6 MR. VOGT: You're taking it out of 7 Kerrville and sending it to Fredericksburg? All 8 right. 9 MS. HARGIS: There is nobody here. 10 MR. VOGT: All right. Well, I'm 11 sorry. Is that -- okay. 12 MR. WALTERS: Based on the County and 13 the City's review and feel like it's a good audit, I 14 make a motion that we accept the independent audit 15 record. 16 MR. VOGT: All right. That's a 17 motion. Do I hear a second? 18 MR. WALTERS: Second. 19 MR. VOGT: Any further discussion? 20 MR. MOSER: I think it was very 21 thorough. 22 MR. VOGT: Those in favor say aye. 23 (The motion carried by unanimous vote, 24 4-0.) 25 MR. VOGT: Opposed? Hearing none the 39 1 Board accepts it and we'll pass it to the City and 2 County for their review. 3 MR. MOSER: Very good. 4 MR. COWDEN: Thank you very much. 5 MR. NEFFENDORF: All right. 6 MR. VOGT: Thank you, Keith. 7 MR. NEFFENDORF: Thank y'all. 8 MR. VOGT: Okay. 9 Off to tax clients? 10 MR. NEFFENDORF: No, no. We'll be 11 done by 5:00 when the post office closes. Thank 12 y'all. 13 MR. VOGT: All right. Moving to 14 Charlie, possible annexation of property adjacent to 15 Mooney, Kevin Coleman. It got dark, Kevin. 16 MR. COLEMAN: They turned the light 17 off on me. Thank y'all. I think this conversation 18 leads from -- somewhat from a zoning conversation we 19 had a couple of months ago. 20 MR. VOGT: Yes. 21 MR. COLEMAN: We went back and looked. 22 I think the map that we showed you-all that showed 23 the airport district wasn't an up-to-date map. Our 24 I.T. or G.I.S. guy has gone back through and created 25 this map. A couple of things, as a picture is worth 40 1 a thousand words, I'll add about a hundred to them. 2 Just so y'all know, everything in green has been 3 annexed into the City of Kerrville. Okay. Those in 4 yellow have not. They are easements that the City 5 and County holds to protect a navigation area of 6 that runway. They are not owned fee simple. There 7 is four and then a fifth one up there. And as most 8 projects do, they lead us down a path and our kind 9 of initial look at this -- and I apologize because 10 we got way late into two other kind of major 11 projects last year and we didn't get the diligence 12 that we needed to. 13 This little piece in purple doesn't 14 appear to have an easement on it. It is clearly not 15 annexed into the City and so know that. We'll 16 continue to look through our documents. It's a 17 little dogleg of a much larger tract that swells up 18 here and catches these residences that's all -- 19 MR. COWDEN: What does that say? 20 MS. BAILEY: Castlecomb Trust. 21 MR. COLEMAN: Castlecomb Trust. 22 MR. McKENZIE: It says in question. 23 MR. COLEMAN: In question, yeah. 24 MR. COWDEN: Thank you. 25 MR. COLEMAN: Again, we'll continue to 41 1 look into that and why that little piece wasn't, you 2 know, kind of closed that. That what it is and we 3 just didn't -- we weren't looking in the right area 4 to find it. So, that embodies my report. Again, an 5 up-to-date map would show these tracts as annexed 6 into the City of Kerrville and they do share that 7 same airport district zoning that all others have. 8 MR. VOGT: Kevin, did I understand you 9 to say -- go back to that purple or blue, whatever 10 that color is. 11 MR. COLEMAN: Yeah. 12 MR. VOGT: That it is possible that it 13 was acquired, it just didn't show up in the 14 paperwork or is this -- this is a subdivision? It's 15 part -- well, it's -- no. There is a Castlecomb 16 subdivision, but that's not part of the subdivision, 17 but it is part of the land owned by the estate of 18 DeJohn Abel who developed the Castlecomb subdivision 19 and owns a bunch of unsubdivided property adjacent 20 to that -- that portion when we condemned the 21 Schilling Door portion, which is right sort of 22 adjacent to it, we gave some consideration to 23 condemning that and I can almost remember our 24 reasoning about why we didn't do it, but it's not 25 coming right to me. But I don't think -- that was 42 1 in 2000 and -- when did we Schilling Door? 2 MR. COLEMAN: '06. 3 MS. BAILEY: '05 or '06. Unless it's 4 been done since then, it was not done at the time 5 because I know that we had a consideration of that. 6 I remember the configuration of the property and 7 that it was DeJohn Abel's property. He has since 8 deceased. That's why it's in his estate and his 9 estate is controlled by his two sons neither of whom 10 live in Texas. 11 MR. COLEMAN: But that was completed 12 in '05, late '05, November of '05 with the Schilling 13 piece, Else, and so, you know, that serves as sort 14 of a drainage area for the development up in here 15 and is tied somewhat to their -- kind of the septic 16 system, the community septic system that serves all 17 of those single family houses. So, it makes -- I 18 wasn't here. It makes some logic to say that it's 19 not buildable. It's on the floodplain. It's a part 20 of their drainage way and their septic. There is 21 no -- 22 MR. VOGT: Well, we -- 23 MR. COLEMAN: It's the cost of the 24 work involved in closing that out may have been 25 greater than the risk and -- 43 1 MR. VOGT: But I would think that for 2 the board we ought to consider that at least as an 3 air avigation easement. I can't even -- I think 4 what you're saying is it's just land you can't build 5 on any way, but stranger things have happened and 6 that sits right in the approach zone. Just to cover 7 it couldn't cost a lot to get an avigation easement 8 above it. 9 MR. COLEMAN: And again, we'll do some 10 diligence if that's what y'all want us to do. 11 MR. VOGT: Yeah. Kevin, I think that 12 would be very important to -- 13 MR. COLEMAN: I think -- I think you 14 might be the same place that we ended up in '05 is 15 the cost of doing that is greater than the risk and 16 I know we have dealt with -- 17 MS. BAILEY: That's kind of what I 18 recall the process being. 19 MR. COLEMAN: And that trust -- you 20 know, as trusts can be, it isn't a single entity to 21 kind of negotiate that or explain that away and it 22 may be as simply as that. It's just the cost 23 benefit didn't weigh out, but we'll reopen the 24 question and kind of finish that conversation. 25 MR. VOGT: I can't even concieve of 44 1 something you could build there if what I heard you 2 say is correct, that it probably is some kind of -- 3 not watershed. There is no such thing as a 4 watershed around here, but at least it's some kind 5 of septic or -- 6 MR. COLEMAN: And I know enough about 7 Castlecomb. I'm not the expert on Castlecomb, but I 8 know enough to know that that is not a completely 9 viable system. 10 MR. VOGT: Right. 11 MR. COLEMAN: Let's put it like that, 12 and so they have some troubles operationally with 13 that area and maybe that's just heightened that 14 concern back in '05 about better left alone and 15 there is no -- 16 MR. VOGT: If you'd just take a look 17 at it. 18 MR. COLEMAN: But we'll go back and 19 look. 20 MR. VOGT: And Bruce, you might look 21 at that too just -- you understand avigation 22 easements and -- 23 MR. McKENZIE: Where is the house for 24 these tracks? 25 MR. MOSER: The one across the road, 45 1 right? Across the road? 2 MR. COLEMAN: There is some structures 3 here and then there is at least -- I don't think 4 it's a house. I think it's a storage area sort of 5 on that piece of property. 6 MR. McKENZIE: Tom, there is a house 7 right here. 8 MR. COLEMAN: I think there is a house 9 right there. 10 MR. MOSER: Oh, that's the one I'm 11 thinking about. 12 MR. McKENZIE: That's the one that's 13 vacant. 14 MR. MOSER: Okay. 15 MR. COLEMAN: Then there is houses. 16 MR. MOSER: So, the airport owns that 17 house; is that right? 18 MR. COLEMAN: No. 19 MR. MOSER: No. 20 MR. COLEMAN: Your easement runs on 21 that green line or the -- right along there and 22 parallels or runs even with the approach zone as is 23 defined. So, that -- if that's the piece you're 24 talking about, that was never in the -- the approach 25 zone was never in part of that. 46 1 MR. MOSER: But the airport owns that. 2 MR. COWDEN: I thought we owned some 3 of that house. 4 MR. McKENZIE: That was my 5 understanding that that was our property. 6 MR. COLEMAN: Right there. 7 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 8 MR. McKENZIE: No, we don't. 9 MR. COLEMAN: We kind of circled this 10 area around '05/'06, so maybe it's happened since 11 then and we can go and see. 12 MR. McKENZIE: I think that's what 13 Scott Bryan had said, that was in '06, the guy at 14 TxDOT. 15 MR. COLEMAN: Okay. 16 MR. McKENZIE: And I thought that 17 house was in it, Kevin. I may be mistaken, but I 18 thought it was. 19 MR. COWDEN: How did y'all research 20 this? Did you have a title company do that or 21 did y'all do it yourself? 22 MR. COLEMAN: Well, no. In fact, 23 in-house we went through and pulled every deed that 24 we could. And again, that's our G.I.S. managers 25 kind of bailiwick in our world. 47 1 MR. MOSER: To each his own, huh? 2 MR. COLEMAN: So, his first run showed 3 nothing in that kind of dateline that would tie to 4 that purple and essentially matched up all the 5 squares. This may not have ever been on his radar 6 screen. Let me get it on his radar screen and we'll 7 kind of figure out from there. 8 MR. VOGT: Kevin, can we -- would you 9 be able to do that before the next -- 10 MR. COLEMAN: I think so. 11 MR. VOGT: -- our next meeting? 12 MR. COLEMAN: We have cleared a couple 13 of big projects that we jointly borrowed time for, 14 you know, so I think we could try to do that. 15 MR. VOGT: That would be something 16 that the consultant would want to know too because 17 that house probably -- 18 MR. McKENZIE: I'm thinking. We'll we 19 don't know. 20 MR. VOGT: I haven't done the math, 21 but it looks like it could possibly be within the 22 sides of the trapezoid. 23 MR. McKENZIE: Of the runway 24 protection zone. 25 MR. VOGT: Right. And if someone buys 48 1 it, they're going to buy it for a lot of reasons and 2 then we're -- and then it would be cheaper now for 3 us to buy it in the long run than go back in 4 condemnation and -- all right. Thank you. 5 MR. COLEMAN: Okay. You bet. 6 MR. McKENZIE: Appreciate it. 7 MR. MOSER: So, we need to take this 8 and overlay with what's -- 9 MR. VOGT: Yes. 10 MR. MOSER: -- what they come out of 11 the plan with. 12 MR. VOGT: We just don't want to leave 13 with -- we want to resolve that for the master plan 14 at least so we can resolve that right away so we can 15 take action. If it's for sale right now, that's an 16 opportunity for us. If it's, in fact, in the air 17 just to get the -- maybe all it needs is an air 18 avigation easement over it as opposed to really 19 buying fee simple. 20 MR. MOSER: That would even be better. 21 MR. VOGT: So they can't build a silo 22 on the side of a house. All right. That was for 23 information. I don't know the Board has any action 24 to take on this. 25 MR. COLEMAN: I've got what I need. 49 1 We'll move forward. We'll determine that piece for 2 y'all. 3 MR. VOGT: Thanks, Kevin. Appreciate 4 that. Okay. Any questions for Mr. Coleman before 5 he leaves? All right. We'll move to -- 6 MR. COLEMAN: Thank you. 7 MR. VOGT: Thank you. 8 MR. MOSER: Thank you. 9 MR. VOGT: -- move to Phase II, 10 construction update under information and 11 discussion. Bruce? 12 MR. McKENZIE: For all practical 13 purposes, the job is complete. It's the time, 14 that's a moving target now because I understand as 15 of this morning that perhaps the electrical 16 contractor will move back on-site this week and 17 begin putting the guide signs on taxiways alpha and 18 echo out here, which was an add that we put on 19 because of the confusion right at the end of the 20 ramp. That was a $65,000 add on that TxDOT is 21 picking that up as well, but the project is complete 22 except for the grass being established, the lights 23 being put in. We have a little work to do around 24 Dugosh and then we have all the sealing that we have 25 to do in May. 50 1 MR. VOGT: In my past life with FAA 2 and State Aeronautics, grass is important. 3 MR. COLEMAN: Oh, right. 4 MR. VOGT: They're going to sign off 5 or release anything until that grass starts growing 6 so -- 7 MR. McKENZIE: No retainage will be 8 released until we have an accomplished stand of 9 grass. 10 MR. VOGT: And tell me again what kind 11 of grass is in there. They didn't hydroseal it. 12 They -- 13 MR. McKENZIE: No. We drilled 14 everything. Old Bermuda, unhulled Bermuda grass. I 15 don't remember all the grasses, but we drilled it 16 rather than hydromulch it. We drilled it with a 17 grain driller. Everybody familiar with a grain 18 drill? 19 MR. MOSER: Yeah. Yeah. 20 MR. McKENZIE: Okay. We drilled that 21 55 acres out there. Then the engineer said, okay, 22 that's fine, but I still want it hydromulched. So, 23 they went back and hydromulched everything on top of 24 the seed. 25 MR. MOSER: That will kill what you 51 1 drilled. 2 MR. McKENZIE: Only to get the 3 moisture in the soil. He was wanting the moisture 4 in the soil, so there was some debate about that, 5 Tom, a lot of debate about that. 6 MR. MOSER: It should kill it. 7 MR. McKENZIE: The engineer said to do 8 it, so Cash Construction -- 9 MR. VOGT: What engineer, the -- 10 MR. McKENZIE: BWR. 11 MR. VOGT: -- contractor? 12 MR. McKENZIE: BWR. 13 MR. VOGT: Okay. They want to sign -- 14 they want to get FAA to sign off on that as soon as 15 they can -- 16 MR. McKENZIE: Yes, sir. 17 MR. VOGT: -- so they can get their -- 18 MR. McKENZIE: Stephen Cooks has said 19 he needs to come down for last checking. Stephen 20 told me and he told all of us. He said, I'm not 21 coming until it's complete 100 percent. He said I 22 won't come back -- 23 MR. VOGT: He won't be here for a 24 while then unless we get some rain. 25 MR. McKENZIE: It's going to be July 52 1 I'm thinking. 2 MR. VOGT: Yeah, July. 3 MR. MOSER: So, what's going to 4 constitute the grass is growing, the hydromulch -- 5 MR. McKENZIE: You need to have -- 6 MR. MOSER: -- or the drilling? 7 MR. McKENZIE: You need to have about 8 70 percent cover of grass. 9 MR. MOSER: Yeah. So, the Hydromulch 10 is where it will come from. The other stuff will -- 11 MR. McKENZIE: You're right. 12 MR. MOSER: -- will be wasted. Okay. 13 MR. VOGT: See what you can do about 14 the rain, will you? 15 MR. McKENZIE: I'm praying about that. 16 MR. VOGT: All right. Any questions 17 on that? 18 Update on the new directional sign as 19 we saw driving in here today. 20 MR. McKENZIE: I don't think Mark 21 heard this. The directional sign was put up Friday. 22 We'll be working on it for a couple of months, but 23 it's mostly complete. We put the electrical in 24 Thursday. The electric contractor came in with the 25 trench and set the conduit and pulled all the cable 53 1 Thursday night. Somebody stole it all, pulled the 2 line and stole it. 3 MR. COWDEN: Oh, really? 4 MR. McKENZIE: All of our electrical. 5 MR. MOSER: Next time tell them don't 6 put any conduit so it's not easy to pull out of 7 there. 8 MR. McKENZIE: That's -- 9 MR. VOGT: Put a sign on there saying 10 live wire. 11 MR. MOSER: Nobody is going to dig it 12 up for that amount. 13 MR. McKENZIE: So, consequently we 14 have already talked to KPUB and we're going to 15 coordinate the next venture where they pull it in 16 the morning, KPUB comes out and energizes it that 17 afternoon and should be in. Hopefully they'll -- 18 MR. VOGT: Who picks up the cost of 19 that? 20 MR. McKENZIE: We will. We will. I 21 mean -- 22 MR. VOGT: They did the first go 23 around for free, right? They laid that -- 24 MR. McKENZIE: Well, no. We paid them 25 for it. I mean, it's -- we will be getting billed 54 1 for that's in their cost to put the -- 2 MR. MOSER: I thought KPUB was running 3 the power down to the sign. 4 MR. McKENZIE: No. They set the -- 5 they set the pole. They put another pole. They set 6 two poles, set the meter, they did that all for no 7 cost. 8 MR. VOGT: Yeah. 9 MR. McKENZIE: We had to -- we had 10 to -- 11 MR. COWDEN: Pole to the sign. 12 MR. McKENZIE: We had to go just from 13 the pole to the sign. 14 MR. VOGT: Oh, okay. 15 MR. McKENZIE: That's on us. 16 MR. MOSER: Oh, okay. Sure. Yeah. 17 MR. McKENZIE: All the heavy lifting, 18 they did it so -- 19 MR. VOGT: Right. Okay. 20 MR. McKENZIE: So, anyway, it is what 21 it is and we'll -- we're going to get it. I'll show 22 due diligence and we'll get it up, I mean, to the 23 sign. 24 MR. MOSER: Is the Kerrville Aviation 25 sign down here coming down? 55 1 MR. McKENZIE: Yes, sir. 2 MR. MOSER: Got a chain saw? 3 MR. McKENZIE: That just went up 4 Friday so -- 5 MR. VOGT: Where is Joey? Get your 6 sign down. 7 MR. KENNEDY: That was the plan. 8 MR. VOGT: It's coming down. 9 MR. McKENZIE: It's just right there. 10 MR. MOSER: It's wooden. It has 11 timbers coming. 12 MR. McKENZIE: We're taking it down. 13 MR. VOGT: All right. 14 MR. McKENZIE: Yes, sir. But to 15 answer your question, that comes down. 16 MR. MOSER: Okay. 17 MR. WALTERS: Come back to the 18 construction, can you give the board an update on 19 what we talked about, the painting, directional 20 painting on the runways to the taxiways? 21 MR. McKENZIE: We got that done within 22 three days after it was brought up at the last 23 meeting. We put one coat of paint on there only to 24 give that some definity, so where we would see 25 everything. We have also recognized the guidance 56 1 signs out there which gave it a distinct -- you can 2 see now where you're -- better, you can see better 3 where you are. 4 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 5 MR. McKENZIE: Now, we are going to 6 come back and we're going to seal all that again, 7 but right after that we'll put one coat on again so 8 you can see and then 30 days later we'll come back 9 to do the last stripe and he'll put the second coat 10 of paint and the glass beads and all of the RPMs 11 that are raised pavement markers. 12 MR. WALTERS: And do you feel like 13 that sealed coating will be done as of when? 14 MR. McKENZIE: It will be done in May, 15 the first week of May. 16 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 17 MR. McKENZIE: That's our plan. 18 MR. WALTERS: May the 5th, isn't it? 19 MR. McKENZIE: Yes, sir, May 5th and 20 6th. 21 MR. WALTERS: Okay. 22 MR. McKENZIE: It should take about 23 five days to do it and I'm going to have to close 24 that taxiway again, but we're going to be 25 functional. We'll just have to back-taxi for a few 57 1 days and as we do that I'm also, through a grant, 2 going to seal around -- this is prime because the 3 pavement is four years old now. I'm going to seal 4 around this terminal building. I'm going to seal 5 the road in front of the Brinkman hangar and seal 6 the road down to the T-hangers. And I think I'm 7 going to go ahead and seal all the way around the 8 Brinkman hangar because we're going to end up with 9 that next year. 10 MR. VOGT: Uh-huh. 11 MR. McKENZIE: And I would like to 12 preserve that pavement. That's going to come back 13 not next year. Well, less than two years. 14 MR. WALTERS: In December of 2012, I 15 think. 16 MR. McKENZIE: It's going to come in 17 less than two years. So, it's right upon us, so 18 it's not that much more in my opinion to go ahead 19 and seal that because then we've got something 20 that's more viable to the market -- 21 MR. WALTERS: All right. 22 MR. McKENZIE: -- if you don't have an 23 objection to that. 24 MR. MOSER: That will be interesting 25 to see how that asset comes into the airport. 58 1 MR. COWDEN: Capital assets you mean? 2 MR. MOSER: Yeah, capital assets. 3 MR. COWDEN: Yeah. 4 MR. MOSER: Right now it's shown as 5 nothing, so okay. 6 MR. VOGT: All right. That's good 7 news. Thank you. Well, not good news about the 8 copper wire, but -- 9 MR. McKENZIE: Well -- 10 MR. VOGT: -- I'm not sure what you're 11 going to do to prevent it from happening again 12 though outside of putting Gloria out there. 13 MR. McKENZIE: We might have to. 14 MR. VOGT: All right. Master plan 15 update? 16 MR. McKENZIE: This next working paper 17 is due in June. We'll have it prior to that for the 18 board to review and they're still working on various 19 and sundry aspects of our master plan I've gone 20 over -- gone over at that last meeting. 21 MR. VOGT: I would like you to ask the 22 consultant maybe, and we can do this at the 23 airport -- TxDOT airport conference. The little 24 changes that we made, they're not nickel/dime, but 25 some of the changes that we suggested as the two 59 1 iterations that we have seen as we have gone on, 2 they have actually gone back and incorporated that. 3 I have reason to do it. I want to make sure that 4 they're listening to us and I have all my notes and 5 I don't want to lose my notes and I gave it to him 6 to do it and he should -- as he does a new update, 7 he ought to go back and fix the older portions of 8 it. All right. They're not older, but the previous 9 portions that he briefed us on that he made changes 10 to. 11 MR. McKENZIE: Okay. 12 MR. VOGT: And one of them -- and I 13 don't know why we can't have this for sure. We have 14 new numbers now on population. It may require them 15 to go back and run those numbers with Kerr 16 County/Kerrville population, but -- and it will 17 change some of your projections. They won't like 18 doing that, but we're looking at 12, 14 year old 19 numbers by the time this master plan gets produced 20 and we're now looking at it. We're looking at 21 numbers that were based on the 2000 census. Again, 22 they won't -- having been a consultant they won't 23 like doing it, but that's too bad. We've got a 24 right to ask to change that. 25 MR. MOSER: The numbers didn't change 60 1 that much. 2 MR. VOGT: Well, probably -- 3 MR. MOSER: They'll go from 20,000 to 4 24,000 in the city and -- 5 MR. VOGT: Yeah. I just want to -- I 6 want to make this thing when someone opens it up -- 7 MR. COWDEN: Yeah, because it's 8 published. 9 MR. VOGT: -- it has 2010. 10 MR. COWDEN: Current. 11 MR. VOGT: Yeah. Instead of going 12 back and having to close after reading the first 13 page that they're using because some of your 14 projections really of use around the airport is 15 based on -- and it's not just -- and it's just not 16 Kerr County/Kerrville. It's other projections for 17 people that come in here. Your transient aircraft, 18 the population move, you know, from San Antonio 19 through Boerne will have an affect on it, so we 20 would like to have that folded in. All right. 21 MR. McKENZIE: We'll see them in 22 Austin next month. 23 MR. VOGT: Well, give them a heads-up 24 on it because I don't want to have them cold on it, 25 Bruce, when we see them in Austin. 61 1 MR. McKENZIE: Okay. 2 MS. BAILEY: When you talk to them, I 3 assume these people are coordinating, but sometimes 4 they don't. I have been reading about some issues 5 with maybe TxDOT wanting to do some widening of 6 Highway 27, and I know that Highway 27 right here is 7 problematic from an FAA standpoint, its location, so 8 I'm hopeful that TxDOT highway division is 9 coordinating with TxDOT aviation division about if 10 they're widening, what they're going to do, where 11 and why and -- 12 MR. McKENZIE: It must be widened to 13 the west. 14 MS. BAILEY: Exactly. So, my point is 15 if you talk to any of those people, make sure that 16 they're talking to each other. Otherwise, I would 17 hate for them to get in the middle of a construction 18 project and then us go, wait. 19 MR. McKENZIE: Before anything like 20 that happens there will be an environmental impact 21 study that will take years. 22 MS. BAILEY: Yeah, I realize that. 23 MR. McKENZIE: We'll have a heads-up 24 on that, but that's a good call. We'll certainly 25 talk to them. 62 1 MR. VOGT: It's really the -- it's 2 really utilities. When they start plucking poles in 3 there -- 4 MR. McKENZIE: Sure. 5 MR. VOGT: -- into the protection 6 zone, but I would hope, Else, that TxDOT would do 7 that. We would have done that. 8 MS. BAILEY: Well, it's seems logical, 9 but that means it's probably not being done. 10 MR. McKENZIE: We need to watch them 11 on that. Okay. 12 MR. VOGT: Well, that completes the 13 open session unless there is something else that 14 needs to be brought up in open session. And I would 15 like to clear up, when we go into executive session, 16 we need to have the court reporter here; is that 17 correct? That's one of the problems -- 18 MS. BAILEY: Well, she needs to be 19 outside to come back in and take down when we come 20 out. 21 MR. VOGT: Right. 22 MS. BAILEY: But for closed session, 23 we just keep a certified agenda. 24 MR. VOGT: All right. She has a 25 Commissioner's Court meeting to go to, but you're -- 63 1 Robin, you're not going to make that until you 2 finish our executive session. 3 MS. BRAME: Right, whenever you 4 finish. 5 MR. VOGT: But all she needs to do is 6 come back in we say, okay, we've closed the 7 executive session. 8 MS. BAILEY: If we take any action 9 based on what we do in executive session, which I 10 don't anticipate but -- 11 MR. VOGT: Is there some way we can 12 relieve her so she doesn't have to sit here while we 13 do that to come back in and say that's all? 14 MS. BAILEY: It shouldn't take but a 15 few minutes. 16 MR. VOGT: Okay. All right. 17 Mr. Henneke, do you have anything? You're here. 18 Are you here just for observations and -- 19 MR. HENNEKE: No. I'm here for good 20 government. 21 MR. VOGT: Good government. 22 MR. HENNEKE: For a good Airport 23 Board. No thank you, Fred, but if there is anything 24 you want to ask me about, I'm here and available. 25 MR. VOGT: Okay. Do we -- in 64 1 executive session the county attorney can certainly 2 sit in; is that correct? 3 MS. BAILEY: Well, actually not unless 4 we have some legal issue with him because if you 5 have outside parties, then it's no longer a closed 6 session. It should be the entity plus their 7 counsel. 8 MR. VOGT: Okay. All right. Well 9 then, I'm going to adjourn the open meeting at this 10 time at 9:31. 11 (The open session was closed at 9:31 12 a.m., and an executive session was held, the 13 transcript of which is contained in a separate 14 document.) 15 - - - - - - - - - - 16 MR. VOGT: Okay. We came out of the 17 nonpublic at 10:23 and we're going back into the 18 public at 10:25. And for purposes of bringing 19 forward those items that were discussed in 20 nonpublic, I can bring them up, I guess, as the 21 chair, we have agreed to increase the salary of our 22 airport manager by 5 percent which -- 23 MS. BAILEY: I think you have to 24 make -- 25 MR. VOGT: Excuse me. 65 1 MS. BAILEY: -- a motion. 2 MR. VOGT: That is a motion. 3 MS. BAILEY: Yes. 4 MR. VOGT: There is a motion that I'm 5 presenting right now to increase the salary of the 6 airport manager by 5 percent which would bring his 7 total compensation, not the whole package, but his 8 direct compensation to 84,000. 9 MR. WALTERS: I second. 10 MR. VOGT: Any discussion? 11 MR. COWDEN: I want to make a point 12 that it brings him in line with some of the -- 13 MR. VOGT: Perfect. 14 MR. COWDEN: -- other guys in 15 competitive markets. 16 MR. VOGT: It brings you in line with 17 your contemporaries almost on the -- it's still 18 less, but it brings you in recognition of your 19 superior performance. And by the way, in open 20 session we're also going to indicate we appreciate 21 your self-evaluation. We feel like you were 22 basically hard on yourself and we're going to raise 23 your -- when we sign off on it to be ones instead of 24 those two twos I believe you had in there. 25 MR. McKENZIE: Thank you. 66 1 MR. VOGT: We are very fortunate to 2 have you, Bruce. You handle things before they -- 3 immediately when they come to fruition. You 4 probably have saved -- and we realize it's a tough 5 economic time right now, but frankly you probably 6 saved this County and this City a lot of money by 7 injecting yourself immediately in the process with 8 TxDOT, FAA to bring new benefits to this airport, 9 and those new benefits include lots of money that 10 comes into this airport. Without you we wouldn't 11 have gotten that, so that's why we have agreed to 12 increase your salary by that amount. 13 MR. MOSER: And managing $9 million 14 worth of construction with a minimum interruption to 15 the airport with no incidents that I know of. 16 MR. VOGT: Yeah. We appreciate it 17 should be more, but we're in tough economic times 18 now, both the City and the County. 19 MR. McKENZIE: I appreciate it. Thank 20 you very much. 21 MR. VOGT: Okay. 22 MR. WALTERS: Thank you. 23 MR. VOGT: Any further discussion? 24 All those -- 25 MS. BAILEY: Did you have a second? 67 1 MR. WALTERS: I second. 2 MR. MOSER: I second. 3 MR. VOGT: All those in favor? No 4 more discussion. All those in favor say aye. 5 Opposed? Hearing none. 6 (The motion carried unanimously, 4-0.) 7 MR. VOGT: The second item is that 8 we -- the administrative assistant, Laurie, we 9 are -- the motion is to increase her salary by -- to 10 step 6 which is commensurate with her area -- her 11 scope of responsibility. Let me get with the motion 12 first. Do I hear a second? 13 MR. MOSER: Second. 14 MR. VOGT: Okay. Discussion? 15 MR. WALTERS: The discussion is I 16 think that proposal is or that motion is in 17 agreement with the airport manager's suggestion. 18 MR. VOGT: Right. And our 19 understanding of County and City proposals, which 20 may or may not be true, but we feel like it's 21 mostly -- like Cory said, it's basically because of 22 your evaluation of her performance this last year 23 and her expected performance for the coming year 24 that we agreed to make her a step 6. 25 MR. MOSER: And one other thing that 68 1 we might add for both of them is we feel like that's 2 consistent with what City and County are doing -- 3 MR. VOGT: Yeah. 4 MR. MOSER: -- for compensation. 5 MR. VOGT: May do. 6 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 7 MR. VOGT: And, Laurie, as far as the 8 board is concerned, and I'll speak for the board, we 9 are extremely satisfied with your performance. You 10 go the extra step, you really do. The fact that you 11 love this job, we actually could hold that against 12 you and pull money from you since that's under your 13 compensation package, but we fully recognize that 14 your efforts here makes your boss look good. How 15 about that? Okay. Where are we with that? 16 Discussion. 17 MR. COWDEN: I guess we're ready for a 18 vote, aren't we? 19 MR. VOGT: All right. Do we have a 20 second? 21 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 22 MR. VOGT: All right. Any further? 23 All those in favor of the step 6 say aye? Opposed? 24 Hearing none so carried 4-0. 25 (The motion carried unanimously, 4-0.) 69 1 MR. VOGT: We have one other item that 2 we discussed that can come forward and this is to 3 direct the airport manager to apply to in 4 whatever -- you can do it verbally or in written 5 communication to use -- I guess to judge their 6 agreement to use the $26,000 left over from the 7 water line project that would be 13 for each entity 8 and use that money to do a preliminary -- or not 9 preliminary, do a environmental assessment of the 10 paint area at Mooney. 11 MR. MOSER: And the 17 and 18. 12 MR. VOGT: Yeah, 17 and 18. 13 MR. MOSER: Buildings 17 and 18. 14 MR. VOGT: That complex there. That 15 doesn't -- we don't expect that to be a major cost, 16 Mike, but it's a target of opportunity with the 17 monies out there instead of handing them back to you 18 and we have to move forward with this. It's part of 19 our master plan process to identify that area for 20 use for our T-hangers and that paint locker sits 21 right smack in an area that we need to develop. 22 MR. ERWIN: As a representative of the 23 City, we would prefer to get our half back and then 24 make a decision on what that money would be used 25 for, and I'm just -- 70 1 MR. MOSER: Well, we knew that it 2 would have to go to City Council, so -- 3 MR. ERWIN: Yeah. 4 MR. MOSER: So, what we wanted to do, 5 Mike, is to show the City what the plan is for 6 revenue from T-hangers over there and how this 7 building sits right in the middle of it -- 8 MR. ERWIN: Right. 9 MR. MOSER: -- so we can let the City 10 see what the potential is -- 11 MR. VOGT: If you'll put a -- 12 MR. MOSER: -- and why we -- why it's 13 important to get this environmental thing so we can 14 put that aside and hopefully use that for 15 negotiation with Mooney to get that property back. 16 MR. VOGT: So, what do you need from 17 us? We would like to put that on the agenda and 18 we'll have it on the agenda and we'll participate in 19 that. 20 MR. ERWIN: I think the one thing we 21 would ask is that not a penny of our half of that is 22 spent -- 23 MR. MOSER: No, no. We -- 24 MR. ERWIN: -- until I have council 25 approval. 71 1 MR. MOSER: No, we agree with that. 2 MR. ERWIN: Because we have seen a 3 couple of times where things have jumped ahead 4 without our council approval. 5 MR. MOSER: No. What we're doing is 6 asking -- send it back to you so we can put it on 7 the council agenda. We weren't -- we wouldn't 8 obligate that money -- 9 MR. ERWIN: Okay. 10 MR. VOGT: -- until they said yea 11 verily. 12 MR. ERWIN: Okay. Then if y'all will 13 put something in writing, we would be -- 14 MR. MOSER: Yeah. Sure. 15 MR. VOGT: And we would appreciate the 16 opportunity to come to that council meeting when 17 it's discussed to cover those items that Tom said 18 that -- 19 MR. ERWIN: Okay. 20 MR. VOGT: You won't necessarily 21 have -- you're a budget guy and I know exactly how 22 that's going to come out so -- 23 MR. MOSER: So, right now it's saying 24 give the money back, but we're saying give it back, 25 but please consider this. Okay? 72 1 MS. BAILEY: Consider letting us use 2 it for this objective. 3 MR. MOSER: Consider letting us use it 4 for this other objective. 5 MR. ERWIN: Okay. 6 MR. MOSER: Yeah. 7 MR. ERWIN: And all I'm asking is we 8 get council's approval before a penny gets spent. 9 MR. MOSER: Absolutely. Right. Yeah. 10 MR. VOGT: Yeah. 11 MR. COWDEN: We understand. 12 MR. VOGT: And for the record, for the 13 record only, I totally appreciate it in this case, 14 and in this one case, Mike, that this is appropriate 15 the way we're doing it. If there is any reference 16 to other projects within our already approved 17 budget, our operating and maintenance budget, O&M 18 budget that we don't necessarily have to go back to 19 City Council for approval on those items. That was 20 money that's already been approved for our use. In 21 this case, this was money -- this was shared money 22 for a project like a capital improvement project and 23 you have all the right to any of that money that's 24 left over coming back to you, but again this -- what 25 we would like to do now is to ask that money be 73 1 spent -- you can put it in place or you can take it 2 back and then give it back to us to do this 3 environmental assessment, this mini environmental 4 assessment for purposes of determining what kind of 5 impact we're going to have in taking over that 6 hanger and having environmental clean up. We need 7 to know it ahead of time. 8 MR. ERWIN: Right. 9 MR. VOGT: Okay. I believe that 10 covers all the items that we had to discuss that 11 brings forward and to be brought forward in public. 12 Any -- did I miss anything? 13 MR. MOSER: I think the only other 14 thing we said Bruce was going to provide Kevin an 15 overlay for the approach. 16 MR. McKENZIE: Kevin and the 17 consultant. 18 MR. MOSER: Right. So, make sure 19 they're looking at the same thing, Mike. So, as 20 Kevin goes back and looks at who owns what property, 21 we want to make sure we've got the proper bounds. 22 MR. McKENZIE: Both to the consultant 23 and to the City. 24 MR. MOSER: Right. 25 MR. VOGT: Okay. Do we have any other 74 1 business come forward to this board? And do I hear 2 a motion to adjourn? 3 MR. MOSER: Yes. 4 MR. VOGT: Query? A second? 5 MR. WALTERS: Second. 6 MR. VOGT: All right. Anymore 7 discussion? All in favor stand up? 8 (The motion carried unanimously, 4-0.) 9 MR. MOSER: Oh, there was one other 10 thing we need to say but about the evaluations. 11 We're going to look at the evaluations and bring 12 them back. 13 MR. COWDEN: The board members. 14 MR. MOSER: The new board members. 15 MR. VOGT: Yeah. All right. 16 (The Airport Board meeting adjourned 17 at 10:34 a.m.) 18 - - - - - - - - - - 19 STATE OF TEXAS ) 20 COUNTY OF KERR ) 21 I, Robin J. Brame, reporter for Kerr County, 22 Texas do hereby certify that the above and foregoing 23 is a true and complete transcription of my stenotype 24 notes taken at the time and place heretofore set 25 forth. 75 1 WITNESS MY HAND this the ________ day of 2 _______________, 2011. 3 ___________________________ ROBIN J. BRAME 4 Texas CSR 5325 Expiration Date: 12/31/10 5 GREENWALT COURT REPORTING 245 Waring-Welfare Road 6 Boerne, Texas 78006 (830)537-4223 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25